User talk:PantheraLeo1359531

Archiv 0 | Archiv 2020| Archiv 2021

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, PantheraLeo1359531!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umbau an der Konradskirche 20231228 HOF03708 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umbau an der Konradskirche 20231228 HOF03755 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tag der Deutschen Einheit in Mödlareuth 20231003 HOF00481 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rendering von Seite Sierpiński-Pyramide 20230513 002 RGB16.png, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rendering von Seite Sierpiński-Pyramide 20230513 002 RGB16.png has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landesamt für Umwelt Hof 20231228 HOF03676 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ernst-Reuter-Straße 119 20231228 HOF03683 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Of course the building equipment in the foreground is disturbing, but as it should illustrate the construction work, this seems acceptable. --Plozessor 19:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untreusee bei Dämmerung 20231230 HOF04190-HDR-1 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Would be better without the person approaching but I think it's ok. --Plozessor 05:41, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untreusee während der blauen Stunde 20231230 HOF04288 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Laitche 22:58, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untreusee bei Dämmerung 20231230 HOF04204-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments White balance is off (check the birch on the right side). --Plozessor 05:41, 7 January 2024 (UTC)  Done Thank you for your note, does it meet your criterias now? :) --PantheraLeo1359531 14:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC) Unfortunately no. It is now brighter (better than before), but the birch tree is still blue (#5599ea). Also there's now slight CA on some trees (but that could be tolerated). --Plozessor 16:36, 9 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Despite a tiny flaws, it's enough to promotion. --Laitche 23:06, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Die Wertschaft am Abend 20231230 HOF04314-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is also a beautiful picture but seems to have too intense blue. --Plozessor 05:41, 7 January 2024 (UTC)  Done Thanks, changes applied --PantheraLeo1359531 13:54, 9 January 2024 (UTC)  Support It still is a bit blueish but I think it is acceptable now. --Plozessor 16:36, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Most memorable shot

Hi PantheraLeo1359531 the 2023 iteration of Your most memorable shot has arrived. Maybe you want to enrich it with one of your photos? That would be great! Just wanting to help to spread a nice idea, best, --Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Wow, tolle Sache! Danke dir :), ich gucke später mal rein --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Samsung Galaxy A34 5G 20231122 HOF01963-HDR RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Samsung Galaxy A34 5G 20231122 HOF01948-HDR RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 22:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Samsung Galaxy A34 5G 20231122 HOF02013-HDR RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 22:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Willy-Brandt-Allee 20230917 HOF09975-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. That this track was named “Willy-Brandt-Allee” seems to indicate that Bavarian authorities did not like Willy Brandt ;–). --Aristeas 20:19, 16 January 2024 (UTC) This would be quite naughty :D --PantheraLeo1359531 15:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

File:The Open Source Way - Episode 1.pdf

File:The Open Source Way - Episode 1.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Omphalographer (talk) 20:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

File:3D-Modell des Sierpinski-Dreiecks 20220520 Iteration 01.stl

File:3D-Modell des Sierpinski-Dreiecks 20220520 Iteration 01.stl has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2607:FB91:8E13:153D:B9EB:5C1C:351F:53DA.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 16:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untreusee bei Dämmerung 20231230 HOF04204-HDR RAW-Export BW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful, but I would suggest to try to get the midtones a bit brighter. Right now it looks a bit gloomy, making the midtones brighter would IMHO improve the overall impression. --Aristeas 08:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)  Done Thanks, I did adjust it :) --PantheraLeo1359531 11:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Thank you! IMHO it’s even better now --Aristeas 19:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Die Wertschaft am Abend 20231230 HOF04314-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Die Wertschaft am Abend 20231230 HOF04314-HDR RAW-Export.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Wahlstand der SPD an der Plauen-Galerie 20190828 005.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Wahlstand der SPD an der Plauen-Galerie 20190828 005.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Didym (talk) 17:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sony FE 24-105mm F4 G OSS 20230104 HOF07713 RAW-Export 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abriss der Industrieruine an Yorckstraße (Hof (Saale)) 20240221 151129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laptop der Marke exone go 20240203 HOF06886 RAW-Export 000276.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 19:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zusatzzeichen als Verbotszeichen 20240229 HOF09384 RAW-Export 000417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 20:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hinweisschilder zu Straßeneinbauten 20240229 HOF09466 RAW-Export 000453.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 18:59, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gestutzter Baum 20240229 HOF09442 RAW-Export 000443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 18:59, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gestutzter Baum 20240229 HOF09456 RAW-Export 000449.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Signalgeber mit "Signal kommt" 20240229 HOF09487 RAW-Export 000463.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Shougissime 20:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

About File:Threadripper CPU Installation Guide! How Socket TR4 Works.webm

Can you not directly copy the YouTube descriptions to commons? For tech YouTubers in particular, they contain almost nothing relevant to the subject of the video and are full of content that makes this video look like an automatic G10 coming from anyone else. (Side note: how much of the IBM Plex Sans JP font have you imported? I started sorting the characters into subcats by line width, and was wondering if its feasible for them to be tagged at upload. If not, I completely understand, and will rerun the cat-a-lot job about once a week. ) Alachuckthebuck (talk) 16:20, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Alachuckthebuck,

thank you for your comment! Indeed, the Youtube description is not useful in that case. I added some information about the process of equipping the CPU to the mainboard. Thank you also for your commitment on the IBM Plex Sans JP topic. In total, there are about 70,000 glyphs, only about 3,500 left. I will try to upload by stroke width, so the files can be categorized in the respective cat (Thin, Bold, etc.). Greetings --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your help, but don't mess up your workflow over this. The upload order doesn't matter that much, as the sort and categorization is run via a custom search query and cat-a-lot runs in batches of 1k-5k pages depending on how busy the server is. Do you think there is an efficient way of adding Unicode categories to each image? (Ie cat:UniFA63, ) I'm not familiar with how commons has handled font categorization in the past, especially for non-English characters.

All the best - Alachuckthebuck (talk) 19:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

It's not a problem at all :). The Unicode issue is a good question... I export the glyphs in Font Forge. And it adds the name of the glyph to the filename, which is often a Unicode. Changing it manually would take too much time, but if there is an automated tool, I am open for it :). --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm not suggesting we change the name, if we do that, tagging becomes much more of a pain, I'm just suggesting that we create a cat for each unicode character (textbook AWB/Bot task, but unless you're planning on importing another font anytime soon, AWB is the way to go.)

All the best - Chuck ^{talk to me} 19:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Sounds like a lot of work, creating a cat for every Unicode character. But I think I will focus on importing prominent fonts :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Cat-a-lot it is.

All the best - Chuck ^Talk 20:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Just let me know when this font is done, and I'll rerun the cat-a-lot for the categories I have done, and start on the cats that I haven't gotten to yet.

All the best - Chuck ^Talk 20:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

I will, thank you :), greetings --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 07:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Chuck ^Talk,

the font is uploaded now :). I added the files in the subcats already. Greetings --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! How many different line thickness does each character have? I know a few of the thickness don't have corresponding subcats yet.

All the best - Chuck ^Talk 18:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

I think it should be 8. I have Bold; Extra Light; Light; Medium; Regular; SemiBold; Text and Thin :). Regards --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

All 8 have a subcat? if not I'll get on that and you can continue uploading the KR version.

All the best - Chuck ^Talk 18:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I think the JP font should have 8. THe KR font subcats will take some time to upload and fill :). Greetings --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

just let me know when it is done. (the "regular" catagory is a pain, as I have to sort the font and then hand check about 100 or so.)

All the best - Chuck ^Talk 19:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

I can imagine! Yes, I will try to remember :), greetings --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:57, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verstaubte Radiatoren Kolink Observatory 20240323 HOF1128 000153 crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterseite des AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X 20240407 074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Micron MTC40F204681RC48BA1R 20240407 076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 00:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

IBM Plex Sans JP catigorisation

Hello Leo, I have finished the majority of the categorization for the font, but can't finish the regular line width category with all 71,000 images in the IBM Plex Sans JP category, and wanted your thoughts on diffusing the category to only contain the 8 subcats. this would also make finishing the categorization possible by finding the 800 odd images that don't have their subcat yet.

On another note, Thanks for adding categories to the IBM Plex Sans KR font at upload.

All the best -- Chuck ^Talk 16:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I think diffusing to the 8 subcats sounds good to me.

Happy to contribute :)

Greetings --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the offer, but I can handle the diffusion by myself

All the best -- Chuck ^Talk 18:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you :), have a nice and relaxing weekend --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

@Alachuckthebuck: : The files in Category:IBM Plex Sans KR are now completely uploaded. Best regards --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, will get to work. seems to me like the worst of the tagging was done at upload, but will take a look

All the best -- Chuck ^Talk 15:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! :) Good luck --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:52, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Looks like you have already diffused KR, still working on diffusing the mother category and some of the other cubcats. thanks for diffusing KR at upload (My edit count thanks you)

All the best -- Chuck ^Talk 16:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

I am happy when I can do helpful contributions :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unteres Tor 1 vor Abriss HOF2093 RAW-Export 000028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 13:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unteres Tor 1 vor Abriss HOF2087 RAW-Export 000027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 13:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Diffusion of IBM Plex Sans JP complete.

140k edits later, the IBM Plex Sans JP Category has been diffused into its 8 subcats with 99.9% accuracy. All hail Cat-a-lot.

All the best -- Chuck ^Talk 21:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Fantastic! Marvelous work! Thank you --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Be quiet! Straight Power 12 1200W 20240405 HOF1650-HDR RAW-Export 000105.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, try FP too. --PetarM 17:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noctua NH-U14S TR5-SP6 20240405 HOF1527-HDR RAW-Export 000076.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good picture. Please create or remove your user category. --Plozessor 04:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2024 - Deutschland

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 30. Juni 2024 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth (kurz: WLE) statt. Dabei können wie immer Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler oder andere Schutzgebiete fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2023 – Landschaft
• 
  Ramsach, ein linker Zufluss zur Loisach im oberbayerischen FFH-Gebiet Murnauer Moos
• 
  Naturdenkmal Sankt-Anna-Linde, eine ca. 300 Jahre alte Winterlinde (Tilia cordata) auf einer Anhöhe südöstlich des Heilbronner Ortsteils Kirchhausen
• 
  Buchenwald im Nationalpark Jasmund nach einem Regenschauer

• Sieger WLE 2023 – Detail
• 
  Großer Blaupfeil (Orthetrum cancellatum) im Naturschutzgebiet Gülper See
• 
  Blüte des Knöllchen-Steinbrechs (Saxifraga granulata) im Naturschutzgebiet Dattenbachtal zwischen Kröftel und Vockenhausen (Taunus)
• 
  männliche Rohrweihe (Circus aeruginosus) beim Jagdflug im Osten Spiekeroogs, Nationalpark Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer

Der Wettbewerb ist zweigeteilt, das heißt, wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Wettbewerbskategorien Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zur Wettbewerbskategorie Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. In der Wettbewerbskategorie Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze in den Schutzgebieten bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen – zum Beispiel in Bayern die Liste der Naturdenkmäler im Landkreis Landshut oder die Liste der geschützten Landschaftsbestandteile in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern mit ihren Unterlisten oder gar einzelne Artikel wie die Landschaftsschutzgebiete Sommerschafweide an Buchhalden und Sommerschafweide auf Hilbertswiese in Baden-Württemberg.

Wir vergeben in diesem Jahr drei Sonderpreise für Fotos von Feldrainen und Feldgehölzen in geschützten Gebieten.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2024 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

Damit es ab 1. Mai mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos for WLE 

Außerdem laden wir dich ein, vom 15. Mai bis Mitte Juli 2024 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die Anfang August tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb 2024 wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 17:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Bildschirmabdruck 20240219 203519 One UI Home CENS.png

File:Bildschirmabdruck 20240219 203519 One UI Home CENS.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Мункач Варош (talk) 11:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterseite des AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X 20240406 HOF1915 RAW-Export 000157.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Shougissime 14:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:ЗСУ вдячні за підтримку та допомогу США.webm

Copyright status: File:ЗСУ вдячні за підтримку та допомогу США.webm

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ЗСУ вдячні за підтримку та допомогу США.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 18:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:В Іспанії затримано проросійського блогера Анатолія Шарія, якого СБУ підозрює у державній зраді.webm

Copyright status: File:В Іспанії затримано проросійського блогера Анатолія Шарія, якого СБУ підозрює у державній зраді.webm

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:В Іспанії затримано проросійського блогера Анатолія Шарія, якого СБУ підозрює у державній зраді.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 18:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Оперативна інформація станом на 18-00 22.05.2022 щодо російського вторгнення.webm

Copyright status: File:Оперативна інформація станом на 18-00 22.05.2022 щодо російського вторгнення.webm

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Оперативна інформація станом на 18-00 22.05.2022 щодо російського вторгнення.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 19:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Looks like someone deleted the license templates, hm --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Оперативна інформація станом на 06.00 24.06.2022 щодо російського вторгнення.webm

Copyright status: File:Оперативна інформація станом на 06.00 24.06.2022 щодо російського вторгнення.webm

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Оперативна інформація станом на 06.00 24.06.2022 щодо російського вторгнення.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 19:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyundai Kona Electric 20240502 HOF2558-HDR RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyundai Kona Electric 20240502 HOF2548 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyundai Kona Electric 20240502 HOF2528-HDR RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Aerial mud 1 nor gl 8k (Rob Tuytel via Poly Haven).png

Hello!

Can you reupload this file? Something seems to have gone wrong when it was uploaded originally. Jonteemil (talk) 07:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

• Ah, the glorious 5 MiB bug... Thanks for this note, I reuploaded it ;) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 09:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

  No worries. I now also noticed that File:Mahnwache für Frieden in der Ukraine und im Gedenken an die Opfer des Krieges in Hof (Saale) am 24.02.2024 HOF09083 RAW-Export 000284.png has the same problem, so it would also need to be reuploaded. Jonteemil (talk) 20:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

  And also File:Volksfestumzug in Hof (Saale) 20230728 HOF05186 RAW-Export.png. Jonteemil (talk) 20:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

  Thank you, I will reupload them later from the archive :). Do you have a way to search for these corrupted files? Greetings --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

  Perfect. Yes, I search for this. Jonteemil (talk) 12:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

  Perfect, thanks! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Bilder von der Re:publica

Hallo, ich habe gesehen, dass du einiges an Bildern aus dem flickrstream der Re:publica hochgeladen hast. Leider fehlen den Bildern Beschreibungen und Personenkategorien. Ich habe bei einigen, über die ich zufällig gestolpert bin, ja schonmal passende Personenkategorien gegeben. Wirst du insgesamt noch an Beschreibungen und Kategorien arbeiten? Kritzolina (talk) 11:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi! Ja, die Personenkategorien werde ich auf jeden Fall machen :). Durch den doofen neuen UploadWizard gehen die Beschreibungen teilweise verloren, wenn man Eigenschaften für alle files übernehmen will :(. Grüße --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

So, habe mal paar Cats ergänzt. Komme hoffentlich noch mal später dazu --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Super, danke! Ich wollte dich nicht drängen. Ich war nur ja vor Ort und habe teilweise auch Bilder von Personen gemacht, die du aus dem Flickr-Stream rübergezogen hast. Wenn die Personenkats drin sind, ist es für mich deutlich einfacher zu sehen, welche meiner Bilder ich noch sinnvoll hochlade. Manche sind ja doch sehr ähnlich, bzw. die professionell gemachten sind manchmal klar besser. Aber wir gesagt, keine Eile, ich komme ja auch nur langsam voran, das ist für mich ein Projekt für die nächsten Wochen. Kritzolina (talk) 15:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Ist doch verständlich :). Solange ich es zeitlich einrichten kann, kann ich die Kategorisierung auch vorziehen :). Bin auch noch an paar Fotos von einem lokalen Feiertag, aber das wird schon. Vielen Dank für Deinen Einsatz! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Wie gesagt, nur keinen Stress. Wir sind beide Freiwillige und machen eh viel - insofern danke auch dir! Es war übrigens auch eine wirklich tolle Veranstaltung und hat viel Spaß gemacht. Nur jetzt bin ich ziemlich Gaga grad im Kopf ... ich schalte nach so Großevents irgendwie immer auf der Heimfahrt mein Hirn aus, glaube ich ;) Kritzolina (talk) 17:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Sind auch viele Reize, die man da verarbeiten muss :D, gute Erholung! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Menschen und Katzen überlegen ein digitales Konzept 20240502 001.jpg

And also:

• File:Menschen und Katzen überlegen ein digitales Konzept 20240502 002.jpg

Yours sincerely, Palemeditation (talk) 12:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Font mass upload

Hello, I noticed your doing another font upload, will any diffusion be needed? All the best -- Chuck ^Talk 16:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi! You are very attentive, nice! :) I think it is not needed, I will categorize by thickness. If you would like to add improvements, you're always welcome :). --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Awesome, just let me know when its done, and I'll take a look when you're done. All the best -- Chuck ^Talk 16:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Alright, I try to keep it in mind :), kind regards --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 592. Hofer Schlappentag am 27.05.2024 HOF7101 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baufortschritt am Sana Klinikum Hof 20240531 HOF7522 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 592. Hofer Schlappentag am 27.05.2024 HOF6807 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:47, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Marina Weisband – frag einen Juden

Hallo, du hast die zwei Videos FragEinenJuden Teil 1- Wer sind Juden.webm und FragEinenJuden Teil 2 - Religion.webm hochgeladen. Es existieren aber noch drei weitere Teile auf YouTube:

• #FragEinenJuden Teil 3: Religiöse Strömungen
• #FragEinenJuden Teil 4: Jüdische Kultur
• #FragEinenJuden Teil 5: Antisemitismus

Lade die doch auch noch hoch (und gib mir Bescheid, dass ich die Lizenz bestätigen kann). Bei der Gelegenheit könntest du eventuell auch noch aus einem der Videos ein vorteilhaftes Standbild von Eliyah Havemann extrahieren, dass in seinen Dewiki-Artikel integriert werden könnte. — Speravir – 23:24, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Danke dir, kann ich gerne machen :) (muss mal gucken, wie ich das am besten umsetzen kann, da Video2Commons gerade Probleme hat). Grüße! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

@Speravir: : Here you go:

• File:FragEinenJuden Teil 3 - Religiöse Strömungen.webm
• File:FragEinenJuden Teil 4 - Jüdische Kultur.webm
• File:FragEinenJuden Teil 5 - Antisemitismus.webm
• File:FragEinenJuden - Teil 6 - Schuledition.webm --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Danke. Lizenz ist überprüft. Dass es noch einen sechsten Teil gibt, wenn auch von ihr selbst mit Fragezeichen versehen, war mir wiederum nicht aufgefallen (er wird nur empfohlen, wenn man den fünften Teil öffnet, was ich gestern nicht getan hatte). — Speravir – 19:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Auch danke :). Habe ich tatsächlich gestern auch nur durch Zufall gefunden; in der Videobeschreibung waren nur die 5 Teile aufgelistet. Grüße! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 06:17, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Tux LinuxLibertineDG.svg

File:Tux LinuxLibertineDG.svg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: This file is an exact duplicate or scaled-down version of File:Linux Logo in Linux Libertine Font.svg. If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Nutshinou ^Talk! 16:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

OK --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwache der Freiwilligen Feuerwehr Hof 20240308 HOF00275-HDR RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --KrzysztofPoplawski 21:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwache der Freiwilligen Feuerwehr Hof 20240308 HOF00255-HDR RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --KrzysztofPoplawski 21:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feuerwache der Freiwilligen Feuerwehr Hof 20240308 HOF00335-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:50, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Too many categories?

Hi, I noticed that you created recently many categories with one image in them, for instance Category:NEC μPD70116D-10 and Category:NEC D70116C-10. Can you explain the reasoning here? The images in both categories show the same integrated circuit, namely the μPD70116 which is marked on the package as D70116 and has the marketing name V30. Cheers, Drahtlos (talk) 20:58, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Ah thanks, these redundancies can be removed :). I create cats for microprocessors so it is easier to find out where what kind of images of microprocessors are missing and what microprocessors are already pictured on Commons. Each category can be equipped with cats of release date, clock rate, processor size, number of cores, which are indicators for progress and additional information. With these, trends of progress in microelectronics can be visualized easier. Of course, redundancies of cats can be replaced by redirections, etc. With an overview of existing microprocessor on Commons, I wanted to structurize the bunch of models, and I am able to add the microprocessors in further cats like release date, after I have made some progress. Greetings :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Would you prefer the writing with D or μ? Then I would correct this :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wandern am Untreusee 20240608 HOF7922 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JPG – CSD in Hof (Saale) 2024 HOF9218 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 21:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JPG – CSD in Hof (Saale) 2024 HOF8983 RAW-Export crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:16, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JPG – CSD in Hof (Saale) 2024 HOF8965 RAW-Export cens crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 21:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JPG – CSD in Hof (Saale) 2024 HOF9326 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 19:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CPUs 20240707 HOF0366 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Could probably add model to the description (currently it's only as a category). --Plozessor 13:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)  Done  Thank you.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CPUs 20240707 HOF0369 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CPUs 20240707 HOF0377 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:47, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JPG – CSD in Hof (Saale) 2024 HOF9003 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:59, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JPG – CSD in Hof (Saale) 2024 HOF0241 RAW-Export crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JPG – CSD in Hof (Saale) 2024 HOF0164 RAW-Export crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:05, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JPG – CSD in Hof (Saale) 2024 HOF0116 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Klimaneutrale Produkte – kurzerklärt.webm

File:Klimaneutrale Produkte – kurzerklärt.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prototyperspective (talk) 15:41, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JPG – CSD in Hof (Saale) 2024 HOF0170 RAW-Export crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice crop and good quality. --Terragio67 20:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC) Thank you :) --PantheraLeo1359531 12:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JPG – CSD in Hof (Saale) 2024 HOF9667 RAW-Export crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would be good to know the names of the policitians ... --Plozessor 04:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC) Thanks, I added one name, the other one I was not able to retrieve :( --PantheraLeo1359531 12:40, 15 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Ok! --Plozessor 04:03, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathauskeller Hof 20240120 HOF06157-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 16:48, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Danke

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531, ich wollte dir mal schnell ein dickes Danke für deine Feinkategorisierung meiner IC-Fotos sagen. Das hätte ich so gar nicht geschafft, ich bin ja schon immer froh, wenn ich die Datenblätter finde und zumindest grob kategorisieren kann. Es werden auch weiterhin viele Elektronikfotos kommen; mein Vorratsregal im Kölner "Lokal K" ist gut gefüllt :-) Raymond (talk) 10:01, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

@Raymond: : Du verdienst den größeren Dank, dass du dir die Zeit nimmst, die Fotos zu machen und alles zu präparieren :D. Ich durfte auch schon das ein oder andere Gerät aufschrauben und dokumentieren, und das braucht manchmal viel Zeit (auch, um gute Fotos von oben zu machen). Die Dokumentation ist manchmal wirklich sehr schwierig, einerseits weil online kaum Informationen verfügbar sind (gerade bei unbekannteren Controllern), und weil manchmal die Ermittlung des Namen schwierig ist (1 und I, 0 und O, etc.). Manchmal haben gar verschiedene Modelle denselben Namen... Ich freue mich schon sehr auf die Fotos (gerade als Hardware-Nerd), und bin dir sehr dankbar für deine Arbeit! Durch die Fotos wird gut dokumentiert, wie sich Technik über die Jahre verändert hat und verändern wird. Vielen Dank für das Feedback ;). Liebe Grüße --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)