Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 07:34:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Other animals#class_:_Scyphozoa
- Info created by Lviatour - uploaded by Lviatour - nominated by Lviatour -- Luc Viatour (talk) 07:34, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 07:34, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 04:57:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
- Info CFrozen lake at Shinko La, elev. 5,091 m (16,703 ft). Peaks towards Darcha elev. 5,500–6,100 m (18,000–20,000 ft). Lahaul, Himachal, Indiareated by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:57, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:57, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 01:29:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Netherlands
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Exceptional lighting and reflections. --Tagooty (talk) 05:33, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2024 at 18:03:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Calidris
- Info created by Needsmoreritalin - uploaded by Needsmoreritalin - nominated by User:Needsmoreritalin -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 18:03, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 18:03, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 20:27, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 20:45, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 21:51, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking colours and clarity. --Tagooty (talk) 05:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:51, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2024 at 16:46:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#People
- Info created and uploaded by G.dallorto - nominated by ★ -- ★ 16:46, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Better pose. Nice light. Good-looking body. Black and white technique fits so well with the nude photography aesthetic idea. Why not? -- ★ 16:46, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The garment covers the face, the image is cringe-worthy, and the vignetting is unpleasant. Wolverine XI 19:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Why is it embarrassing? ★ 21:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2024 at 16:22:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
- Info From the first moment, I was impressed by the professionalism of this pop singer. Although it is not known, he worked for 17 years for a cover band in Emilia-Romagna (Italy). Alessandro Samaritani, guitarist and singer, for a moment found himself with a good expressiveness in the center between the microphone and the rising moon. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:22, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:22, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 20:46, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2024 at 12:13:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United_Kingdom
- Info created by b3tarev3 on Flickr - uploaded by Advocate from Sandtown - nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 12:13, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gbawden (talk) 12:13, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:30, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2024 at 18:42:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Others
- Info I wanted to show in this photo how, despite the passage of time, our minds remain young. All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 18:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Cringe. Wolverine XI 19:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Why mate? Wilfredor (talk) 22:15, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support: provocative, but in a good way, I think --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2024 at 16:53:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info On a big-five safari, one is on a vehicle so when the animals are close the PoV is poor. This shot of the leopard approaching required a good crop. That explains the smaller-than-usual resolution. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:45, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Isn't WB here is a bit off? Красный wanna talk? 18:47, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I think the shadows have been lifted too much -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:47, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Question Where comes the blue light from? Was there a light source from the left? It looks nice but unnatural. --August (talk) 04:31, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Certainly no light beam in this National Park -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:47, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Charles, ACR's colour mixer is often a good way to get rid of the blue cast on lifted shadows without messing up the white balance of the remaining image. Toning down the blue channel a few notches should do the trick. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Certainly no light beam in this National Park -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:47, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for all the helpful comments. New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:13, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- I think both the subject and the background benefited from the new processing (less contrast and sharpening?), but isn't the blue colour cast stronger? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:15, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Stronger now, yes, I agree -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:22, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Don't know. I reduced blue as you suggested! Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:45, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps you reduced luminance instead of saturation? That would explain the stronger cast. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 13:55, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Tried on the JPEG file, a -35 blue saturation gets rid of the cast. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:00, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Charles, I've uploaded a new version, what do you think? Julesvernex2 (talk) 16:31, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Tried on the JPEG file, a -35 blue saturation gets rid of the cast. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:00, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps you reduced luminance instead of saturation? That would explain the stronger cast. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 13:55, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Colors on shadow side go to pink, in all colors dont convince me, crop-composition neither. --Mile (talk) 17:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- I wonder what I can do about this user Mile? On my last 10 (successful) FPCs, he has two other opposes this one, this one, 3 negative comments, 3 ignored, 0 positive votes (last few months). Is this a case for Commons User Problems? He has many current support votes (and no opposes) for others' wildlife images.Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:40, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Last version is fine, in my opinion. Appealing front view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support It's fine now. Front view of leopard is rather appealing, agree with Basile. Красный wanna talk? 08:22, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2024 at 10:07:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info Finnish model and politician Tanja Karpela in 1998 - created by Seppo Konstig - uploaded by FinnaUploadBot - nominated by Thi
* Support -- Thi (talk) 10:07, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I would support a JPEG version. Yann (talk) 10:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 12:22, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support tiff is more for raw(or scans) and not for web. Please transform it in JPG using RGB --Wilfredor (talk) 18:44, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Converting master images (i.e., versions of what Wikimedia Commons uses as source images when scaling) from lossless images to lossy compression is a bad idea as it degrades the image quality. Also, Wikimedia Commons does a good enough transparent conversion from TIFF to JPEG on the fly that there is no need for manual conversions for general use just to get a JPEG version of the file. --Zache (talk) 23:16, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support A JPG version is a standard format that has the advantage of a low weigh. It is also easy to download, and to display in many softwares and browsers. You can choose the best conversion rate with minimum loss, almost insignificant. And the original TIFF remains available with a link in the image page -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:45, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose JPEG version is better for FP. Yann (talk) 17:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
- Support Normaly i dont touch film photos, i support both, here i added some light and remove red capilars in eye. --Mile (talk) 12:22, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
SupportGood execution. Thanks for the edit, Mile. I think the inversion of the vignetting as an improvised solution for the retouch is very successful in this case and fits harmoniously into the image. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:50, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support withdrawn Without doing a research before, I did not know that this is a historically important photograph with a bio. Therefore I withdraw my vote, although I believe a plain derivative would be permissible. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:55, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:40, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support withdrawn --Thi (talk) 21:39, 1 August 2024 (UTC) Comment The edited version is a good addition and I would like to support it, but it is too bright when compared to original. --Thi (talk) 09:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Original photo is here. It is a famous photograph, part of the "Finnish Heritage Agency". You can't change the appearance of a widespread cover of magazine Eeva, and pretend the author is the photographer Seppo Konstig with such a fancy effect as this white gradient all around. Many photographers don't like this nebulous, cloudy style, and it would be misleading to believe that the photographer chose this appearance for that portrait. You can modify the photos that belong to you as much as you want, but for the significant photos that are anchored in history, it seems essential to me to respect the original source, even if it is not to the taste of all the participants from Wikimedia in 2024. Imagine Che Guevara, or Louis Armstrong with a similar white cloud outline, it would be ridiculous to promote such a version. Okay for the original (unedited) in JPG only -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:19, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Basile. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:29, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Alternative 2
- Support This is unedited JPG picture with the 1990s-style color saturation. [1] --Thi (talk) 09:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Conversion was fine in my opinion. No difference between both versions (TIF and JPG) in a sRGB environment. Excellent portrait -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Here in Browser WB is completely off. --August (talk) 10:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I have uploaded better version. --Thi (talk) 11:21, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the edit. Funnily enough, I just created an improved version too, with an embedded sRGB profile :) But your version has more vivid colors. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:43, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 20:48, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2024 at 06:37:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The building is leaning to the left a bit. May be it's because it's very old. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 00:18, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed. But I think the building is not completely vertical, you can compare here. According to this Korean website: "The pavilion was leaning to one side", it was therefore disassembled and restored. It is estimated to have been built in the late 1860s. Thank you -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Merci pour les explications. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 06:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:31, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support! --Terragio67 (talk) 21:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2024 at 20:08:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
- Info African buffalo (Syncerus caffer), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. The African buffalo is one of the "big five" African game and is widely regarded as a very dangerous animal. Its shoulder height can range from 1.0 to 1.7 metres (3.3 to 5.6 ft) and its head-and-body length can range from 1.7 to 3.4 metres (5.6 to 11.2 ft) and it can weigh 425 to 870 kilograms (937 to 1,918 lb) (males weigh about 100 kilograms (220 lb) more than females). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: would support if shadows are brightened somewhat --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- The Cosmonautː Done Poco a poco (talk) 21:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Much better, Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- The Cosmonautː Done Poco a poco (talk) 21:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharp where it needs to be, nice colors too. Glad all of the flies are out of focus. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 02:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The pose is not unusual, the sharpness is below par. The flies are an important element. The existing FP of Cape buffalo is better. --Tagooty (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2024 at 21:31:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Others
- Info Rivets on the bridge support in St. Petersburg – created and uploaded by Александр Байдуков - nominated by Augustgeyler -- August (talk) 21:31, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- August (talk) 21:31, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- chromatic aberration -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Augustgeyler, Александр Байдуков, ArionStar, and Basile Morin: This is a very nice FP candidate and it would be a pity if the nomination failed due to technical issues. In the JPG file, I have removed various chromatic aberrations, especially in the left part of the image. You are welcome to upload the file for an update or a derivative if you are satisfied with the result: Download link via SwissTransfer. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 06:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks to user Zzzs for the update by using the edited file. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:58, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. August (talk) 21:20, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks to user Zzzs for the update by using the edited file. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:58, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good spoting.--Mile (talk) 08:48, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Exemplary use of the diagonal method as a compositional choice; pleasant color contrast, good technical quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:58, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support I fell in love with this image 3 years ago and I'm still in love with it. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 20:17, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin and Mile. – Aristeas (talk) 09:11, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:49, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support This bridge have always fascinated me and here's rather unusual view of it. Красный wanna talk? 11:23, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:40, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support The shadows create a very cool pattern with the rivets. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2024 at 19:54:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Sun
- Info created and initially uploaded by Alessandro Diniz Coutinho - cropped and nominated by ★ -- ★ 19:54, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Resembles the Flag of Niger. -- ★ 19:54, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Good composition but the image size and quality are very low --Wilfredor (talk) 18:46, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 15:51, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2024 at 16:46:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity
- Info Rembrandt, The Return of the Prodigal Son - uploaded by Dcoetzee - nominated by Thi
- Support -- Thi (talk) 16:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support I tried to open the file with the browser, but the result was unpity at the highest resolution. Using instead the "large-image-viewer", I was astonished by the details. Really a great job. --Harlock81 (talk) 17:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Typical super quality of the Google Art project. Viewing the overwhelming amount of detail with the zoom viewer works without any problems. Even the finest hairline crack is clearly visible. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:30, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:06, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:48, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Harlock81 and Radomianin. --Terragio67 (talk) 17:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:46, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2024 at 12:36:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
- Info No FPs of this species. Created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 12:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 12:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:09, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:39, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:30, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:47, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great feather detail --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 18:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:44, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2024 at 06:56:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)
- Info created and uploaded by Ivan Gorgulenko - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 06:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 06:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment No need for a half-bird. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think this photo deserves a little bit more discussion. Perspective, focus and crop are certainly unusual. But people often consider the colourful throat as the most interesting feature of this species, and therefore it makes some sense that the photo emphasizes the throat and shows it in all its beauty. – Aristeas (talk) 09:09, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment More discussion, then, though I know Aristeas does not welcome my critiques. Apologies to the photographer for going into more detail: The composition is unnatural, awkward and unbalanced. The point of view is well below the bird which is surprising considering a 600mm lens was used. The foreground bush is distracting, as is the blurred tail. The chest feathers are nicely in focus but the eye and top of the head are not. The choice of lens means that even with F8 the depth of field is poor. So 3/10 for artistic impression and 3/10 for technical merit. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Charles, I appreciate your critiques, especially when they are clear and detailed as this one. When I emphasize the strenghs of a photo which has been criticized by you (or anybody else), I do not do this because I want to contradict you, but because IMHO photos deserve a good discussion which considers both the merits and the vices of each image. This a good way to encourage others to examine the image in detail for themselves, and ultimately to arrive together at a balanced judgment in a lively exchange of opinions. -- Aristeas (talk) 18:59, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. --Thi (talk) 09:53, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Problem of focus and depth of field. Eye and top of the head are out of focus. The whole body lacks detail. Also the unappealing blurry tail. In addition to the feet missing, the distracting foreground makes the composition cluttered -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:44, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2024 at 01:36:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
- Info: Furnas hot springs, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support A clear overview. --Thi (talk) 09:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 20:49, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2024 at 20:54:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Cercopithecidae_(Old_World_Monkeys)
- Info Zanzibar red colobus (Piliocolobus kirkii), Jozani Chwaka Bay National Park, Zanzibar, Tanzania. This species of red colobus monkey is endemic to Unguja, the main island of the Zanzibar Archipelago, off the coast of Tanzania. It is now classified as an endangered species and in the mid-1990s was adopted as the flagship species for conservation in Zanzibar but the population is still decreasing. Note: we have no FPs of the genus Piliocolobus. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Well exposed, great detail. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:59, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 03:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition and exposure. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:16, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Needsmoreritalin. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 08:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 06:27, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful posture and composition. – Aristeas (talk) 09:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:45, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above, and let me add: Well captured in his environment. --Terragio67 (talk) 17:47, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:43, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2024 at 18:50:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Duos (depictions of two people)
- Info created by Pierre-Auguste Renoir, digitized by Getty Center, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support Famous painting, digitized by a renowned institution, high resolution. -- Yann (talk) 18:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 19:20, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:59, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 10:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:49, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:41, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2024 at 13:41:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical#1930-1939
- Info created by Russell Lee - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Info Original title retained, since the word Negro was a lot more respectful in 1939, not starting to go out of favour until the late 1950s, and "Colored" is really unavoidable given the subject. I'm not sure that Wikipedia can unilaterally change the title of an artistic work where the original is hosted elsewhere, so think we're stuck with it unless the Library of Congress changes it. In any case, let's not use such terms outside of appropriate historical/cultural contexts because everyone should feel welcome here. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Could we please NOT use the original titels as titles for the image on Commons? It is a bit of a shock to come across it like this. If you gave the image a different title (something like "Historical image of Black person during the time of segregation by Russell Lee", you could then give the original title in the description. This would help many people, because they would be prepared for the use of discriminatory terms in that context. --Kritzolina (talk) 09:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Technically, it's not a discriminatory term for the time; it is now though. Not sure how best to treat that. Like, of it was the N-word proper, then obviously shouldn't be in the filename, but... Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Could we please NOT use the original titels as titles for the image on Commons? It is a bit of a shock to come across it like this. If you gave the image a different title (something like "Historical image of Black person during the time of segregation by Russell Lee", you could then give the original title in the description. This would help many people, because they would be prepared for the use of discriminatory terms in that context. --Kritzolina (talk) 09:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:40, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Adam says it is not cropped, but the missing bits of the crucial sign are a great shame. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. Alamy, who are never opposed to selling public domain works at a high markup, have a copy which crops the left sign, which does not seem a good solution Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Historically significant. --Yann (talk) 18:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:12, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:34, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:26, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 10:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support I don't have a problem using the original title, providing it is in fact the title and not just someone's description. — Rhododendrites talk | 15:20, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- They usually put a "Title designed by library staff" or put it in brackets if it's modern. This one appears to be the one from the catalogue they were given with it. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 10:43, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 20:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2024 at 09:06:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Propeller_aircraft
- Info HB-PMN at Seaplane-Meeting in Yvonand 2021 – created and uploaded by Roy Egloff - nominated by Augustgeyler -- August (talk) 09:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- August (talk) 09:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:28, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well captured, high resolution image, and very sharp for a moving subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:15, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile – and good, quiet background. – Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:58, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 10:43, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:40, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2024 at 04:28:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
- Info Waterloopbos, detail of the monumental work of art Deltawerk // formerly Delta Flume. (artists RAAAF en Atelier de Lyon). A narrow high space between two works of art with horizontal supports gives (in my opinion) this a special spatial effect.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support I agree with your opinion. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support An interesting example of vanishing point photography. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:16, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 22:09, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 06:29, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 09:02, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 10:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support! --Terragio67 (talk) 17:53, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unusual eye-catching perspective. --Tagooty (talk) 05:27, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 22:16:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Vespidae (Hornets, Paper Wasps, Potter Wasps, and Yellowjackets)
- Info European hornet sting under a microscope / Created by Alexander Klepnev - uploaded by Alexander Klepnev - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 22:16, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 22:16, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Main categories missing. The white halo is very distracting -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Categories added. JukoFF (talk) 19:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:31, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, the halo. It takes time but is fixable manually -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Even as it is with the halo the image remains remarkable and exceptional. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Useful. --Thi (talk) 10:00, 2 August 2024 (UTC)s
- Weak support This halo isn't a result of overprocessing, but how the cut have appeared under the microscope IMO. And with that I vote for difficulty of making this photo over the quality (that is also not as bad as it can be). Красный wanna talk? 13:18, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 22:11:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Pollen
- Info created by Pavel.Somov - uploaded by Pavel.Somov - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 22:11, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 22:11, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Its amazing that something so small can cause so much misery, each spring. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support It would be useful to add a reference dimension to the picture or add information about the dimensions of the pollen grain in the description of the image. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:23, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:31, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating structure -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:01, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 20:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 16:10:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
- Info An unusual PoV only made possible with focus-stacking. Only image of this species of swallowtail on Commons. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but this side perspective isn't working as it should. Wolverine XI 18:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Could you explain a little more, please? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Can you respond please Wolverine XI? Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- The unsettling thing about this viewpoint, in my opinion, is that the proboscis of the butterfly is hidden from view. I am also unable to discern the body shape, colouration of the ventral side and underwing. I can only make out the head, back, left wing, and tail. In other words, I would really like to see more of the body than just the wings. Still, the details are excellent. Wolverine XI 13:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Lastly, where are the six jointed legs? Wolverine XI 13:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- The unsettling thing about this viewpoint, in my opinion, is that the proboscis of the butterfly is hidden from view. I am also unable to discern the body shape, colouration of the ventral side and underwing. I can only make out the head, back, left wing, and tail. In other words, I would really like to see more of the body than just the wings. Still, the details are excellent. Wolverine XI 13:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Can you respond please Wolverine XI? Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes a very unusual perspective, but very interesting. -- -donald- (talk) 07:19, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support There are very few butterfly profile images, it's a very interesting angle. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:22, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support LGTM --Zzzs (talk) 17:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 06:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:01, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 10:51:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#France
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharpness and light overshadow symmetry. ★ 13:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Definitely not symmetrical, as the left side takes more space than the right. Wolverine XI 18:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support A better solution than to cut the pulpit --Llez (talk) 15:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wolve. I suggested another crop for a more intentional un-centred composition, which I would support. --August (talk) 21:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment My opinion is it would be better to include as much space to the right as to the left. The fact that the interior furniture is asymmetric does not affect the symmetrical architecture. The current choice of framing is a bit weird -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 10:42:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Neutral A more impressive sky could give a plus in the wow factor. ★ 13:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)- Support I really like this. Colors, ambient. ★ if you think sunny, you can get ugly shadows on one side. I would even more scarry darker weather. --Mile (talk) 15:12, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yep! A good argument! ★ 15:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:21, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Mile.The colors are special to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:29, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 22:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 17:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Question Was there perspective correction applied afterwards? --August (talk) 04:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 10:37:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Acrocephalidae (Leaf, or Marsh Warblers)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:47, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Clear, sharp image with wonderfully soft background. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 14:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:54, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Just maybe, some 50 px crop on right. --Mile (talk) 15:14, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Mile.--Ermell (talk) 15:24, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:21, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:15, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:28, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 04:55:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
- Info A decorative golf-themed nest box on a wooden fence on West Sacramento Avenue in Chico, California. Maybe the gallery …/Objects#Others would be more appropriate than …/Objects#Containers, I'm a bit unsure and would appreciate any suggestions. Thank you very much. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 04:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support It is not a bird that has nested there, but a spider :) I like how the crooked birdhouse contrasts with the wooden fence. It's the mixed fascination between the beautifully designed main motif and the traces of natural slow decay. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- The other nest boxes are at '.../Objects#Other objects in landscapes' so I would recommend that section. Btw, for all the other non-golfers here: A "birdie" is a common golf word and something that most players would like to achieve, hence the pun. ;-) --Cart (talk) 09:35, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the gallery suggestion and the insight into the world of golf, Cart :) I have updated the gallery accordingly. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Containers store inanimate things, not living animals. ★ 21:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- The other nest boxes are at '.../Objects#Other objects in landscapes' so I would recommend that section. Btw, for all the other non-golfers here: A "birdie" is a common golf word and something that most players would like to achieve, hence the pun. ;-) --Cart (talk) 09:35, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Special photo. Well taken with an eye for colours and the proportions are perfect in my opinion..--Famberhorst (talk) 04:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Funny. The contrasting selected colours (gray background, green nest box, red golf flag) and the distinct pattern of the aged wood background make it beautiful to me. – Aristeas (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 22:14, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 04:37:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Sun
- Info A second try. Yes, I was in a rush and didn't wait for other users' opinions. Wow factor overshadows quality issues, in my opinion. Created and initially uploaded by Thales Augusto dos Santos - cropped by Poco a poco - nominated by ★ -- ★ 04:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 04:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not the best quality, as the sunset could be more appealing. I'd also add that the image is not special and that the boat could be more centered. Wolverine XI 18:44, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:22, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment "Wow factor overshadows quality issues, in my opinion" – It's nice but I don't see much wow here, compared to this recent upload of an evening (?) sky, for example. 80.129.250.195 18:13, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 20:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is borderline, lacks wow. Not close to images in the FP gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 05:40, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Snowy egret (72749).jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 02:12:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Egretta
- Info Snowy egret (Egretta thula) stares into the water in the middle of a pond. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 02:12, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 02:12, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It should be possible to rescue the blown highlights on the wings -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:15, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- new version uploaded - some recovered, but it is quite white. — Rhododendrites talk | 18:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 22:18, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:11, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful reflections in the regular waveforms; an impression of balance through the space allowed to breathe in the upper two-thirds of the image. The benefits of the composition outweigh minor technical shortcomings. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent and beautiful composition. – Aristeas (talk) 14:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very uninteresting as thumb, but nice when zoomed. --Mile (talk) 14:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:57, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support I wonder what the bird was thinking at that moment --Zzzs (talk) 01:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:26, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:29, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Cicada killer (73200).jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 01:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family_:_Crabronidae_(Crabronids_Wasps)
- Info A cicada killer (Sphecius speciosus) perched on a black-eyed susan (Rudbeckia hirta). One of the largest wasps in North America, the females dig nests and hunt cicadas while the males fight each other for territory. For a few weeks in the summer, they can be quite a spectacle -- especially the males, giant wasps constantly fighting over patches of dirt. This is the first time I've seen them perch on flowers to defend territory, so it made a good photo opportunity. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 01:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 01:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:47, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great, like autumn shot. --Mile (talk) 15:14, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 15:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 14:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 22:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:39, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2024 at 11:24:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Musical instruments
- Info created & uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 11:24, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:24, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks to Tomer T for this nomination. The instrument is very beautiful to look at but it also has amazing acoustics.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:24, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:43, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 22:25, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tmv (talk) 00:18, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:47, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 21:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The tilted upwards point of view is leading to perspective distortion. It might be intentional, or could be seen as wanted perspective impression. But therefore the angle is to small. The angle is somewhere between intense perspective and just leaning verticals. So I think it spoils the composition. --August (talk) 10:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Agree the verticals could be fixed in this case. Also, I find the lonely piece of pillar + bit of light on the right distracting. It makes the composition random -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2024 at 21:22:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1890-1899
- Info created by Marc Ferrez - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Non destructive restoration, well done --Wilfredor (talk) 21:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good job! ★ 21:42, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Request to Adam Cuerden: can you restore this image? It will be my next nomination. ★ 22:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
...I did. Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)- Oh, there's a link there. Thought you were talking about THIS image, as in, the one nominated. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes! I just found it amazing! ★ 13:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, there's a link there. Thought you were talking about THIS image, as in, the one nominated. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2024 at 13:23:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
- Info created by unknown 14th-century painter - uploaded by Kcx36 - nominated by AirshipJungleman29 13:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Of high historic merit—the most used depiction of Genghis Khan, probably notable in its own right. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Could be better, just saying. 20 upper 13:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- "You can do better" opposing is a invalid argument, according to the guidelines. ★ 04:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- What are you trying to start? Unless you point to me this "guideline", I will not put up with your nonsense. Wolverine XI 12:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Commons:Featured picture candidates#Voting. ★ 12:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I see it, but there was no reason to strike my comment without my consent. I'm not a newcomer and I don't appreciate disrespect. I was expecting more from you. Wolverine XI 13:12, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's not the same comment, either. Before pulling your weight around, kindly double-check, since English is not your mother tongue. Wolverine XI 13:23, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Your reason for opposing is invalid. That's the point. ★ 13:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Don't push my buttons, and apologize for striking my comment. Wolverine XI 15:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Your reason for opposing is invalid. That's the point. ★ 13:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's not the same comment, either. Before pulling your weight around, kindly double-check, since English is not your mother tongue. Wolverine XI 13:23, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I see it, but there was no reason to strike my comment without my consent. I'm not a newcomer and I don't appreciate disrespect. I was expecting more from you. Wolverine XI 13:12, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Commons:Featured picture candidates#Voting. ★ 12:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- What are you trying to start? Unless you point to me this "guideline", I will not put up with your nonsense. Wolverine XI 12:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- How so Wolverine XI? AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- ?? Could be better, maybe could be Picture of the Year? :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- "You can do better" opposing is a invalid argument, according to the guidelines. ★ 04:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support High level of detail, good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:58, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. We can see the texture of the silk in all detail and every brush stroke. – Aristeas (talk) 18:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 17:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 20:09, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2024 at 08:37:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Morocco
- Info Alawid architecture “Ahl Fas Mosque”, Rabat. My shot. --Mile (talk) 08:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 08:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Unremarkable. I don't know what I'm looking at. Wolverine XI 13:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support The photo made me stop almost instinctively. It's not the building that I find attractive. There may be better photos of buildings. The special thing about the picture is the combination of geometric shapes and different color surfaces. That alone is excellent for me. --XRay 💬 20:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment True, i didnt concentrate just on mosque (photo which i had too), but all those shapes and was moving around that spot till i find this as best. White wall, green roof and mosque. So i put "architecture" and not just "mosque". --Mile (talk) 12:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'm asking myself if a sky without clouds had resulted more effective in this recall to the representation of shapes and volumes. --Harlock81 (talk) 15:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Harlock81 Probably would. --Mile (talk) 18:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support XRay's aesthetics. ★ 02:00, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 15:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support per XRay. – Aristeas (talk) 18:16, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Wolverine XI. -- Karelj (User talk:Karelj 09:35, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good, but the compo isn't outstanding to me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:37, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- per XRay.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:31, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:36, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Just like XRay's reasons to support. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 17:35, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2024 at 00:14:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
- Info: panoramic view of Ponta da Ferraria; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Don't love how part of the road is cropped, but since it's minor, it'll do for me. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:28, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 19:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 15:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:34, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:17, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Mon 29 Jul → Sat 03 Aug Tue 30 Jul → Sun 04 Aug Wed 31 Jul → Mon 05 Aug Thu 01 Aug → Tue 06 Aug Fri 02 Aug → Wed 07 Aug Sat 03 Aug → Thu 08 Aug
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Thu 25 Jul → Sat 03 Aug Fri 26 Jul → Sun 04 Aug Sat 27 Jul → Mon 05 Aug Sun 28 Jul → Tue 06 Aug Mon 29 Jul → Wed 07 Aug Tue 30 Jul → Thu 08 Aug Wed 31 Jul → Fri 09 Aug Thu 01 Aug → Sat 10 Aug Fri 02 Aug → Sun 11 Aug Sat 03 Aug → Mon 12 Aug
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2024.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.